| Author |
Topic: Issue 2 annotations. (Vol. 2, on with
the spoilers.) |
Broad Arrow
Jack Myrmidon |
posted March 02, 2000 03:48 AM
Here's an extract of the script, regarding the strange backgrounds
on page 15.
FRAME 2: ...The Harlequinade are still behind <Jack> but
they've changed and are in their traditional costumes. Pierrot and
Columbine make hand shapes. More images vibrate off them - Edith,
Tom, Robin, King Mob...
FRAME 3: Now they are the King In Yellow and his dwarves, making
hand movements. Behind them, a whole crowd seethes - everyone who's
ever appeared in the series...
So, looks like Ridgeway didn't draw the crowd of characters
(Jimenez would have), which seems like a pretty important part of
the story, if you ask me, and it completely confirms October Ghost's
earlier theory that the Harlequinade was, in fact, anyone and
everyone...
[This message has been edited by Broad Arrow Jack (edited March
13, 2000).]
|
Sandfarmer Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 03:50 AM
Thanks BAJ. Now I'm more pissed that Jimenez was not involved. He
would have drawn everyone in beautiful detail. Maybe I'm just being
harsh becuase I'm currently in the middle of a Vol. 2
re-read.
|
Broad Arrow
Jack Myrmidon |
posted March 02, 2000 04:11 AM
And while I'm on the subject, let's just go through and point out
all the places where the art isn't communicating what's in the
script.
Page 2: The idea here is that the hair on KM's headdress has
razorwire in it, and he's slashing open the soldier's face, "like a
strike from a lethal cheerleader pom-pom."
Page 6: Not an art thing, but Roger is trying to say "Suck my
clit, asshole."
Page 15, Frame 5: "Helga looks up off panel - a final word falls,
dislodged by someone high in the vaulting. We can read 'Murderer.'"
Page 16: Helga is collecting Miles' urine in the cup.
Page 17, Frame 1: "The eclipse passes and for a moment the sun
and moon cross one another in the shape of the Vescica Pisces."
Page 17, Frame 5: That's KM, off to find a phonebooth...
|
Broad Arrow
Jack Myrmidon |
posted March 02, 2000 04:11 AM
Page 18, Frame 4: Supposed to be Audrey Murray on the left, passing
the cafe.
Page 19: Audrey Murray again, though thanks once again to mister
Vozzo she's coloured incorrectly. She looks like Jacqui, but for
anyone who dares make a connection between the two, there is none.
Page 20: The police are there looking for KM.
Oh, there is also the not-so-small matter of pages 12-14,
which I shall discuss tomorrow once everyone's had a chance to read
the comic.
[This message has been edited by Broad Arrow Jack (edited March
13, 2000).]
|
Enamon Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 04:32 AM
Considering the fact that a whole lot of us are dissapointed with
issue 2, whether it be that the artist either fucked up or just got
lazy or the coloring guy really screwed everything over, I suggest
that those of us who are good artists and those of us who are not
draw their own version of the comics. We can get the script from BAJ
if he agrees and then we can scan the pages in and send them to Tom
or BAJ or to Grant himself and let him take the best pages and put
them together. That way it'll be a sort of huge Nexus Artist Jam.
This then will be the OFFICIAL issue 2. The way it was meant to be.
So what do you think?
|
Lionheart Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 04:43 AM
Fine with me. Maybe Grant would color it himself.
Also, about page 22, here's why it seems to me that Jack/Dane is
in charge.
The girl says:
"You think I'm dumb? Your authority is on shaky ground." which
shows that he is in a position of some authority. Not the
headmaster. Maybe he's a teaching smurf, no?
-=Lionheart=-
!!!BANG!!!
|
greenmonk Initiate
|
posted March 02, 2000 05:03 AM
I live in Seattle, where Jack is on the last page, and there is a
Roy Lichtenstein exhibit showing here at the Art Museum on limited
engagement. Synchronicities abound.
Id leave some annotations, but the book is making the rounds
amongst my roommates, who I converted.
|
Enamon Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 05:06 AM
Yep. BAJ is correct as always. That Fuck U girl HAS appeared in the
comics before. Dont you remember "The Girl Most Likely To", when
Robin tells her story? One of the new Invisibles with BROWN hair is
utilizing 4d armor against the Archons. We will see her in Issue 1,
the epilogue.
|
number
nun Operative |
posted March 02, 2000 05:16 AM
um, i think you people are getting a little weird. Obsession is not
healthy, not at all. go watch passions, it will help you get over
the fact that a comic book didnt live up to your expectations.
|
Broad Arrow
Jack Myrmidon |
posted March 02, 2000 05:59 AM
Having read the script and knowing what this should have been,
it's quite literally crushing to see it turn out this way.
I've had a very bad day today and my usual congeniality has gone
on holiday until tomorrow.
And Enamon: good show. You're bang on about the identity of the
Fuck U girl.
[This message has been edited by Broad Arrow Jack (edited March
02, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by Broad Arrow Jack (edited March
13, 2000).]
|
guvnor Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 10:22 AM
Damn, and I though it was going to be Dane operantly conditioning a
young Ragged Robin to become the "character" she needs to be...
I'm pretty sure Dane now has the ability to walk into any
building and convince people of his authority just by speaking in
archetypes like he did in issue 5.
As for the "pervert in the weird little glasses" discussed in
frame 1, could that be John A Dreams, and/or a member from the Outer
Church?
|
Sandfarmer Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 12:36 PM
Braod Arrow Jack- thanks for sharing so much with us about
this and answering so many questions. I want to re-ask a previous
question though. (Last question on the first page of the thread)
About the archons, what happened, we see them after Dane on page 3
and then they are forgotten. Also what about the mix ub between
issues about Roger being in the archon's hands and also what about
the Queen. We see her with the crown in issue 3, but nowhere at all
in issue 2?
|
KenV Initiate
|
posted March 02, 2000 02:23 PM
I think everyone should take a few deep breaths of air as pure as
they can find....(as I tell my sons..deeply in thru the nose and out
thru the mouth)Despite what seems to be fuckups in the
art/coloring(a common problem in comics forever-I recall the great
Steve Ditko telling me about this in the 60s-Lets not
forget:INVISABLES is one of only a handfull of
great,amazing,mindblowing,insightful,magic,
meaningful,incandesant,timeless,beautiful comics ever.Up there with
FROM HELL.This past weekend I reread the entire series for the
fourth time.Each time has been extremely rewarding and(I feel)will
continue to be.Take Burroughs' cut up technique into
consideration(helped by the date changes/captions).One issue left
before I can really weigh in,but I'm formulating already.Some of you
need to pull back and try to view the whole. BAJ-loved your
stuff.Please send hard copy to Ken Viola 13 Fieldview Road Andover
New Jersey 07821-2052 USA Also-I'm collecting copies of Morrison
scripts.Have several AMan and DPatrol to trade.
|
Topper Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 02:36 PM
Didn't Jack draw the Archons into his body? Miles thought they were
possessing him -- but Jack says "I ate them." Seems shaky to me, but
that's the impression I got.
While I can't express disappointment with issue 2 as a whole, I
*am* disappointed that one of the major revelations on "the most
important pages of the series" is, again with Grant, an old idea
thought up by someone else. The idea that if you viewed a human from
outside time they'd look like a centipede, each section representing
a day -- I mean shit, that appeared in the comic Concrete for shit's
sake.
The art: I don't have the hatred of the Panders that some others
do. Ridgway is top notch and I thought BAJ was good too. But Wood's
pages weren't good -- in fact they were a murky mess. I missed the
boat that that was the chessman too.
Please tell me we get to see the conclusion of the John a Dreams
/ Fanny confrontation in issue 1.
And what about that missing text regarding Billy Chang from a few
issues back? BAJ, can you post that too?
|
October
Ghost Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 02:36 PM
A few things:
First off, I think that referring to the Audrey Murray situation
as 'cheap irony' is missing the point. It's not just irony, it's an
occurrence that condenses the theme of the entire series right down
- two people who should be enemies in a dualistic world help and
comfort one another because they're unaware of their differences.
Audrey's ignorance of KM's history guaranteed her impulse to help
him - but it never would have struck her as something she needed to
do if he hadn't murdered her husband in the first place. It's almost
like a chess game - Bobby is sacrificed to put Audrey in position so
that she can save KM when the crunch comes.
I really, really wish Jiminez (or somebody with a similar eye for
detail) had drawn those panels on page fifteen. That's all I'm gonna
say about that, to prevent myself from flying into a rant.
While it is pretty difficult to break your neck by yanking back
on your leg, it is possible, and the scene was obviously meant to
echo the Hanging Man of the tarot, signifying (among other things),
excessive sacrifice or overzealousness.
I think the last image in the chapter, where Jack is holding out
the badge and saying that the comics the new recruit reads are all
real, is one of the best in the series.
OG
|
Sandfarmer Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 02:40 PM
I think you are right Ken V. Issue 2 still tells a great
story, we all just know how good the comic itself could have been.
My bother-in-law/room mate is a casul comics reader. He reads Spawn
and a bunch of titles I don't read and I recently turned him onto
the Invisibles and he digs King Mob but when I showed him issue 2 he
too was shocked at how horrible some of the art and colors are.
|
Sandfarmer Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 02:46 PM
Yes, on a good note, I too thought the last page was great. The last
page left me smileing and that's about all you can ask from a comic
book.
|
Dr.
Zum Operative |
posted March 02, 2000 04:59 PM
<< First off, I think that referring to the Audrey Murray
situation as 'cheap irony' is missing the point. It's not just
irony, it's an occurrence that condenses the theme of the entire
series right down - two people who should be enemies in a
dualistic world help and comfort one another because they're
unaware of their differences. Audrey's ignorance of KM's history
guaranteed her impulse to help him - but it never would have
struck her as something she needed to do if he hadn't murdered
her husband in the first place. It's almost like a chess game -
Bobby is sacrificed to put Audrey in position so that she can
save KM when the crunch comes.>>
"Best Man Fall" had us look into the life of a "throw-away"
stock badguy, and make us understand and perhaps care for Bobby.
This is a guy who could have BEEN King Mob, but took the wrong path.
The constant intrusions of our characters into his life meant
him for greater plans than a motivation to call 999 for KM! Besides,
if you see a gunshot victim, do really NEED a personal reason to
call for an ambulance? Also, KM's miraculous 1-day cure rather ruins
the heart-felt death-speech of the previous ish, don't you agree?
Hamlet would suck if it ended up with a "well THAT turned out to be
a lucky break".
<< While it is pretty difficult to break your neck by
yanking back on your leg, it is possible, and the scene was
obviously meant to echo the Hanging Man of the tarot, signifying
(among other things), excessive sacrifice or
overzealousness.>>
Yeah, but it's more probable that he would merely end up swinging
from the rope, very alive, and screaming and writhing in
pain. Symbolism sacrifices mere common sense here. Remember...I
caught the Tarot reference. There are many others - like the
Tower / charnal pit, Temperance / John's two vials, et al. I just
found them forced.
I stand by my previous remarks. DrZ
[This message has been edited by Dr. Zum (edited March 02,
2000).]
|
rory Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 05:10 PM
Fuck U signals the end of the individual.
Hey 70's, Looks like Mister Six wants a Division X mini-series
afterall!
I like Buckingham's fanny.
Glad to hear Cell 23 got their blessed hand of glory back.
The pander bear art was pretty good.
BAJ - you are Invisible.
i loved the Ridgeway GAZ panel - that scene repeated by different
artists creates a strange vibe around the 'moment' it represents.
p14/15 do seem weak - ther's no denying it.
And in the end...
Mr Dreams really did provide us with a Scooby Doo conclusion.
Suits are back in fashion. Write on!
|
betty
woo Operative |
posted March 02, 2000 05:34 PM
From the state of Helga's hair re-growth when she meets KM outside
the hospital, I'd hazzard a guess that at least a week or two had
passed since the eclipse. KM wouldn't remember a lot of it, given
the kinds of painkillers he'd likely have been dosed up on.
Audrey does more than just call 911 - she obviously stayed with
him in the hospital (how else does she know he's been raving about
raw carrots?), making sure he pulls through. From the phonebooth
scenes last ish, it seemed obvious that there were many people
around - yet Audrey was the one who stopped to help.
Think of it this way - while any of us might not hesitate to stop
and help a bleeding, heavily pierced bald man in a leather jacket,
do you think the average person would be as comfortable (especially
in the age of aids paranoia)?
Mile's hanging pose reminds me of Gideon Stargrave strung up on
the electrical wires in Vol I, 18. Is the sacrifice actually his
life, or simply the identity of Sir Miles, Judas to the Invisibles?
That would dovetail with Mister 6's earlier sacrific of his teacher
personality, and GM's whole theme of growing beyond the individual
personality.
Oh, and re: Straight Edge - it's still around, it's just never
made very good media copy and thus doesn't get much attention (look!
Kids not doing drugs! How exciting is that). I've a cousin in
Virginia who's very into the straight edge scene down there.
Besides, like the blank badge, the "x" is a fairly generic symbol
that can mean pretty much whatever you want it to.
|
Dr.
Zum Operative |
posted March 02, 2000 06:09 PM
Nope, KM's out of hospital in ONE DAY.
Page 18/panel 1- Mr.
6: "What a hideous incredible day!" panel 4- shot of Soho Cafe
where Fanny and Jack are talking...AND Audrey is walking
past. Page 19/panel 3- Audrey arrives at hospital w/snacks, SAME
OUTFIT
DrZ
|
swell41 Initiate
|
posted March 02, 2000 06:12 PM
Now that we've seen the true form of ourselves on 14, that dinner
scene in 3.4 has a whole lot more visual meaning, especially page 18
panel 5. It's really pretty amazing how one page of this series can
add resonance to the entire fifty or so issues which preceded it.
And if the Nexus Jam 3.2 never sees print, we'll at least always
have it in our heads thanks to the noble and talented BAJ.
And Audrey's appearance on page 18 panel 4 makes me wonder if
Paul Thomas Anderson wasn't directing that page.
And! So, does this mean that the nagging question I've always
been wondering, where Robin landed in the past, has been answered?
Is that her discarded timesuit in Philly that John's been hanging
about in? Because, I mean, she had to land somewhere, right? Or did
I miss it.
"We just have to make sure the maggot gets turned into a
fly." Just when you thought the series had REALLY reached its
climax, we find that it was only really a prologue.
Amazing. Benjamin.
|
Ganesha Myrmidon
|
posted March 02, 2000 06:14 PM
I have to say, I'm disappointed in this issue and, by implication,
in the series as a whole.
First, the artwork. Given the apparent complexity of the scripts,
the 'artist jam' has been a complete failure. Apart from Yeowell,
Buckingham and our own dear BAJ (even partially obscured by Vommo's
dismal colouring), it's shit.
It's wrong to put all the blame on the art, though. The ending
was so trite, leaving so many questions unanswered (I won't even TRY
to begin with those...) I could barely believe it. Just lends
validity to the theory that Grant started something he couldn't - or
wouldn't - finish properly. Unless the FINAL final issue pulls
something big out of the hat, The Invisibles will appear sadly
truncated.
Definitely a whimper.
|
October
Ghost Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 06:39 PM
Ganesha et al:
I have to wonder what, exactly, you were looking for in the
resolution to this series...the war described in the pages of the
comic are, by implication, never going to end until this undefined
evolution takes place, and the "seed" planted in time germinates.
After that happens, maybe time can be discarded, part of the
"scaffolding" that is shed.
But I don't think the Invisibles was ever meant to show us what
that germination would look like, nor to explain how to end the war.
It's about something that's ongoing, and it's a metaphor for
something real. Hence Jack's statement at the end of v3.2 - "It's
all real". He's not just talking to the straight-edge gal there,
he's obviously also talking to us.
I can understand that people who were looking for a tight, clean,
comic-book ending aren't going to be happy, but I think we could all
see that coming a while ago. This series was about the mission KM's
cell had to complete, not about the all-encompassing end to the
struggle. They completed it: the shoggoth/monster/archon failed to
be crowned, and the hell-on-earth that the misguided agents of the
Outer Church were hoping for was prevented. (You'll notice the
agents of the outer church who probably really know where it's at
didn't do a hell of a lot to prevent the intervention - i.e. John
A'Dreams, the Archons themselves, etc) The seeds are free to keep
growing.
I don't know, maybe we'll all be satisfied when v3.1 comes out,
and it WILL show the resolution of the conflict. Personally, I think
"Invisible Kingdom" came to a brilliant end, plot-wise.
OG
|
El Homre
Invisble Initiate
|
posted March 02, 2000 06:47 PM
I hate being right. I've been naysaying throughout Book 3, seeing
the nonsense piling up and the speculation deadending (how many dead
ends on how many theories??) in the scooby-doo ending if I may
borrow from another poster.
6 years.
Well, we still have one more to go, but I'm not about to count on
it.
Just to add to my comment but not lengthen the page too too much;
I wpuld really have been satisfied by the ending of Book One or even
the botchy Book two ending over what we have here. Not that I'm a
"och, it was better back in the day" types, but the ending was
quick, satisfying as well as mystifying whereas issue Two of Bol 3
is... walking through Grant's pot smoke.
[This message has been edited by El Homre Invisble (edited March
02, 2000).]
|
rory Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 06:52 PM
Dr. Zum - concerning your obsession with KM's one-day hospital
holiday...
Page 18, panel 1:
George: Time's still a bit iffy, sir. I'm not really sure how I
got here.
Some of the criticisms concerning the art not matching the script
I can understand, but surely this arc has been about perception
bending, fiction rippling through reality etc.
Linear time structures and narrative have completely broken down
by this point.
I mean the Queen's lying dead on the floor for fucks sake. You'd
expect the nurses in the hospital to be chatting about that wouldn't
you?
Jolly Rodger in a mass grave - seems appropriate - what did you
want a 21 gun salute?
King Mob still in his bloody t-shirt? So!!!!
I see this issue as a conclusion to the Invisible Kingdom arc.
I'm looking forward to the final issue.
That said, Ridgeway's fuck up on the 'eclipse as gnostic fish
sign' panel really is unforgivable.
|
Dr.
Zum Operative |
posted March 02, 2000 07:45 PM
So the continuity was deliberately subverted to appear as a rush-job
clusterfuck? I suppose we'll see next issue whether our artist
reached too far, and the center could not hold.
Daedalus plummets. We rise to fall... DrZ
|
Ganesha Myrmidon
|
posted March 02, 2000 07:47 PM
I've never really understood the fuss over Ridgeway myself; he does
an adequate job, but he's hardly what you'd call exciting, is he?
OC: I'm not quibbling with the ideas in The Invisibles; I just
feel let down by the sloppy execution. And I don't think it's
unreasonable to expect at least some of the loose ends to be tied up
- if decent plotting is a 'comic book ending' then so be it. I can't
rid myself of the feeling that it was all meant to be a little
grander in its sweep; that Grant ran out of steam partway through.
Having said that, the artwork was clearly intended to convey a
lot more than it actually does - and there's still the final issue
to go. Perhaps I'll be surprised yet...
|
Loz Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 08:04 PM
Well, bollocks, quite frankly. And if the artists jam was Grant's
idea then maybe the editor's and powers that be at Vertigo central
could have made a touch more effort to make sure everyone involved
was singing from the same hymn sheet? After all, the last episode of
Babylon 5 didn't start with the announcement; "For a bit of fun,
Sheridan is going to be played by Delenn, Delenn by Franklin and
Garibaldi by a small puppy we found in the street." And from what
BAJ said, even Ridgeway joined in the general
fuck-uppery. Despite what other people said, I liked Audrey
Murray's appearence, after all Bobby was one of the first ones that
KM shot after all. Bit of a weak ending regarding the Archons
though, 'I ate him'. Fer fucks sake! A plan devised for centuries
and they underestimate their intended vessal? And as for
Orlando; Orlando; "It's me, I'm back to wreak my revenge on that
little tranny slut!" Fanny; "Piss off Orlando!" Orlando; "Oh
all right then..." <slinks off dejectedly>
I don't know how much of this is due to GM having to shrink a 75
issue storyline down to 64-odd. But I do feel a little disappointed
with what we got here, one issue to go or not (though I read the
woman on the last page as us, which means my life's going to be
wonderful between now and May next year).
But BAJ- Consider yourself one of the few managing to walk out of
the Abbey with your honour intact :-)
|
October
Ghost Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 08:19 PM
Ganesha, I think I'm asking which loose ends we want to have tied
here. I can see that some of the events of "Invisible Kingdom" seem
rushed - I'm not entirely clear on what it is Jack did to the
Archons or how he did it, for example - and that's a little
distressing...but at the same time, I don't feel that too much has
gone unresolved. I think a lot of what's bothering people here is
that it turns out some of the things we've been speculating up and
down about aren't really all that important, in the end.
OG
|
Enamon Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 08:29 PM
Ok. Couple of things.
First of, I've got just slightly more than a year to turn into a
"pervert in the weird little glasses" and get to Seattle.
Two, so what does everyone think of having a Nexus Artist Jam?
Especially BAJ, what do you think?
Well I guess that was a couple of things. Enamon out.
|
Ganesha Myrmidon
|
posted March 02, 2000 08:30 PM
Fairly basic things, really. More info on the multitude of
characters which were introduced and went nowhere (and sorry,
'They're all the Harlequinade' doesn't cut it, frankly). More on the
Outer Church (what happened to all the Kings-of-Whatever? Did Jack
eat them ALL?). A little resolution to Robin's story. Further
background on the Invisible College, the other Invisibles Cells,
KM's 'reality-crossing' ability.
I keep remembering Grant's interviews at the outset of the
series, and how I imagined something much BIGGER somehow, more
sweeping. I seriously think Grant initially did, too...
|
October
Ghost Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 08:40 PM
Well, I can't speak for Grant or see the future, but I'm guessing
that a lot of the information related to the aftermath of the battle
(i.e. Robin, the state of the Outer Church, etc) will be handled in
the final issue.
As to whether "We are all the Harlequinade" is enough, I think I
better agree to disagree. I think it perfectly caps the story, and
lends each and every character a dignity and significance that they
would have lacked as "bit players".
And to tell the truth, if we were given every detail there was to
know about the Invisible college, the other cells, the extent of
each characters' abilities, etc, I think the series would be
incredibly bogged down with detail, and ultimately very boring.
OG
[This message has been edited by October Ghost (edited March 02,
2000).]
|
Ganesha Myrmidon
|
posted March 02, 2000 08:45 PM
I think it's also a fairly easy way to write off those characters
which Grant meant to develop further but became bored with. As you
say, let's agree to disagree.
Maybe you're right; maybe the next issue will resolve things
properly. I really hope so.
|
sleazenation Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 09:41 PM
I still have this nagging vision of an alternative ending where King
mob finally pays the ultimate price for his years of generating bad
karma-- and does so willingly knowing that he must atone and
juxtaposing that is the unrepentant jolly roger who must chose if
she is going to follow king mob's example or not....
|
number
nun Operative |
posted March 02, 2000 10:03 PM
yeah im a funny guy. Anyone read yesterdays preacher? I cant get
over the part where starr and featherstone discuss her love for him.
Oh wait, invisibles board, thats right-hey you can't really
expect a great end! You can't draw five or six years into a head and
expect it to pop like the worlds greatest zit! I thought it kicked
ass, but then im american so i tend to say stupid shit. Sorry your
disappointed, BAJ, i really am, but such is life! Gotta enjoy what
you got, i mean goddamn you inked grant morrisons art work. Tell me
that isnt fucking brilliant?
|
Andrew/Alex Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 10:20 PM
I caught Preacher, and I loved "this is about my genitals"
Starr,despite being a military genius, has the narrowest mind in the
history of Vertigo. Anyway, Inv. # 2 can be summed up
in-disappointing. Forget whimper, going out with a squeal of agony.
THe art I'm used to by now, but still-if I had an extra IQ point for
every unresolved plot thread (not getting my hopes up for 1.1) I
could outsmart all of Grant Morrisons genius characters combined.
Like, I loved 1.3, but the Orlando/Fanny confrontation resolved in 2
panels? Lame. Fanny + George confronting John? Cool answer to the
Philadelphia Church thing(well, an answer, which is more then I can
say for most of it), but otherwise, unresolved. The identiy of the
Blind Chessman? The Harliquinade? Division X? The whole damn point
ripped off from Slaughterhouse-5? To quote my sister(re talented Mr.
Ripley, not this) "Its like they ended when they ran out of film"
Granted, the shitty descripion of the world beyond the mirror (ok, I
have a problem with some of the art) may have contributed (it looked
like a block in Harlem which had about a million smoke machines. Hey
BAJ, you said they didnt have the description right-why dont you
post the script for those pages?) But still-that doesnt exsucse "I
ate it" Wow, I guess its just that easy. I sense you dont want
all negatives, so on the plus side: The Black Grail as Mile's
suicidal urine was pretty cool, as was the effect of shooting Sir M
with Key 23 then dropping what appaered to be a shredded dictionary
on him(that ruled until you wondered how they got that to work)
Anyway, I just hope Issue 1 will resolve Takashit, mason, Jim
Crow, Boy, and especially Ragged Robin. If it doesnt, I will be
forced to join the "Grant Morrison is self indulgent crowd" You have
been warned. Well, no I wont. I dont care if the ending is Bobby
Murry waking up, the rest of GM's work is still amazing. (Just so
you dont all lynch me now)
|
PornoHolocaust Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 10:28 PM
If Grant ever does anything with the Invisibles again (in comic
form) I hope he gives all the art to BAJ. It could be called "The
Invisibles Adventures", and when Mason shows up he'll look just like
the lantern-jawed Bruce Wayne from the cartoons.
|
Sandfarmer Operative
|
posted March 02, 2000 10:54 PM
We can all be appologists and make up excuses for all the loose ends
and that's all well and good. Stories have loose ends, that's what
keeps us wondering. I felt the story in Vol. 3, issue 2 is fine. I
would have liked to have seen some of my favorite characters get
more attention but that's just me and its GM's story.
My problem is that issue 2 by itself just is not a good comic
book. A good comic book needs two things, a good script and good
graphic storytelling. I think the artists jam prevented the
posibility of good graphic storytelling. The comic book medium has
certain rules like it or not that are necessary to follow for a
comic to be interesting and make sense. Now I'm not talking about
being old fashioned. Grant has pushed the limits of the medium
sucessfully with this series up to now. Telling the story in a
non-chronological order is fine, the comic book reader can adapt.
However, to pull off sucessful graphic storytelling, continuity is
fairly important. I'm not saying that ones hair should be parted on
the same side in every panel or that characters should always look
the same like Charlie Brown or Mickey Mouse but for fucks sake, the
editors of a comic should at least make sure a character as
important as Sir Miles looks like fucking Sir Miles and at least has
the same hair color!
Lets take BAJ's pages for example...great graphic storytelling, I
easily understand what is going on and I immediately recognize all
the characters becuase they look the way we have been taught over a
six year period that they are supposed to look. That's good grahic
storytelling. Now in comparison, let's look at Ashley Woods pages.
Without doing some thinking, I don't know who any of those fucking
drawings are suposed to be. That sure as fuck IS NOT Sir Miles in
page 12, panel 2 (even though we know it is suposed to be). That is
bad graphic storytelling. Can her three pages ruin the comic? For me
they did. I supose that's my loss.
|
Ganesha Myrmidon
|
posted March 02, 2000 11:04 PM
I totally agree. With all the weird time stuff, the jump-cuts and
the general complexity of Grant's stuff, it helps if the artwork is
at least consistent enough not to actually obscure things further.
The impossible ideal, I guess, would've been a super-coordinated
Watchmen job - except with Grant and BAJ. Niiice...
| |